The Lessons of the Pirate League

In the beginning look, the 3 males sitting round a desk within the Embajadores eating place in downtown Bogotá made not likely partners. True, they had been all more or less the similar age, of their mid- to late-20s. And, as they traded stories of journey, their accents would have given away that each one 3 had been Argentines, some distance from house.

However this is the place the similarities ended. One member of the celebration was once tall, blond and all the time immaculately dressed. Alfredo Di Stéfano was once arguably essentially the most well-known athlete in South The usa; he would pass directly to turn out to be essentially the most celebrated participant of his technology. It was once a standing he took severely.

His visitors, then again, should have bordered at the raveled. Ernesto and Alberto had been each docs, however that they had been touring for months, tracing the backbone of South The usa on a couple of dusty, beaten-up motorbikes, dwelling out in their saddlebags, ceaselessly dozing underneath the celebs. Their faces had been bearded and their garments worn.

A chum of a pal had put them in contact with Di Stéfano. And in spite of his status, he had now not handiest agreed to satisfy with them, however he had come bearing items: some yerba maté, the sour natural drink that Argentines like for some reason why, and — maximum vital — a few tickets for a sport day after today.

For this reason Ernesto and Alberto had been in Bogotá, in any case. They had been each football fanatics, and so they had taken a ruin from their paintings in Leticia, close to the Peruvian border, to make the hourslong adventure to the capital so they might watch essentially the most thrilling crew in essentially the most thrilling league on this planet. They had been right here to look the pirates play.

It’s only with hindsight, and the information of who was once sitting with him at that desk, that it’s imaginable to look simply how peculiar a scene — painted vividly in Ian Hawkey’s biography of Di Stéfano — this is.

One of those two doctors would witness such rampant inequality on the journey around South America, and in Colombia in particular, that he became convinced of the need for social change and, eventually, violent revolution. A few years later, the world would know Ernesto, the 24-year-old cadging a ticket off one of his country’s finest players, as Che Guevara.

Inside the Embajadores that day, though, he was just a kid, a doctor, a fan. If anyone at that table was a rebel, it was Di Stéfano.

That is what is always said about these ideas. They could not work, soccer’s establishment haughtily warns, because renegade clubs would be cut adrift from their national and continental associations. They would become pariahs.

That has, the warning runs, real consequences. Their players would not be eligible to play in FIFA competitions, and good luck persuading Kylian Mbappé to get on board if he can’t play at the World Cup. There could be no mixing with the teams left behind in the national leagues, no domestic cup competitions, no involvement with UEFA, no way back. This is always presented as the final threat, the hurdle no breakaway proposal could ever clear.

The lure of outlaw soccer even stretched to Britain, still considered the pinnacle of the game. For players there still earning a maximum wage — which then capped even the highest salaries at only 12 pounds per week — the sums on offer in Colombia were too good to turn down: thousands of dollars in signing-on fees, inflated because the pirate clubs did not have to pay transfer fees, plus hundreds of dollars in salaries.

Accepting the mutineers’ cash was so controversial that the stories of how the players made their way to Colombia seem to be drawn straight from spy novels: Bobby Flavell of Hearts being bundled into a moving car on the runway at Glasgow airport; Neil Franklin, regarded as the best English defender of his generation, being smuggled out of the country incognito.

(Only Matt Busby, the great Manchester United manager, seemed to understand the motivation. When his left winger, Charlie Mitten, received an offer, he told him to accept it. “Go, or you’ll die wondering,” Busby told him.)

It did not last, of course. Few of the Europeans who made it to Colombia settled. Franklin lasted only six games. Within a few years, the league had been forced to come back into FIFA’s fold, and the glittering array of stars it had contracted floated away. Some were welcomed back at the clubs they had deserted. Others, particularly in England, were treated as heretics, scorned for daring to try to earn more money.

Why bring this up now? Partly, in all honesty, because it is a brilliant story, one that has not been told nearly often enough — though Franklin, at least, has been the subject of two books in the past year: “Flight to Bogotá” and “England’s Greatest Defender.”

Partly because, as Europe’s elite clubs flirt with the idea of a breakaway league once again, the days of El Dorado provide a warning: Ultimately, players will go where the money is, and fans will follow. The clubs of the pirate league could pay their generous salaries only because Colombia’s stadiums were packed to the rafters. With a fragmented, international audience, it is probably fair to assume the same would happen with a super league.

But it is mainly because, for all the fire and fury generated by any mention of a super league, it reminds us that even unwelcome developments can bring unexpected benefits and that, often, it is the breaks with orthodoxy — whether the birth of the Premier League itself or the Bosman ruling — that have changed soccer’s history the most.

The most obvious consequence of the pirate league was the rise of Real Madrid: Santiago Bernabeu, the club’s ambitious president and Pérez’s precursor, snared Di Stéfano when he left Colombia, a transfer that almost instantaneously made his team the sport’s first continental superpower.

But the era’s effects rippled out in countless other ways. In England, it is likely it contributed to the end of the maximum wage — abolished in 1961 — and what was known as the “retain and transfer” system, which was dismantled two years later. More broadly, it may have hastened the arrival of soccer’s superstar era, concentrating more power, and more money, in the hands of the very best players than they had ever enjoyed before.

The day after their meeting with Di Stéfano in the restaurant, Guevara and his companion, Alberto Granado, went to watch Millonarios play. Guevara was not especially impressed: He wrote to his mother complaining that the seats had not offered the best view.

Perhaps it was no surprise Guevara did not take to it: The pirate league was a glimpse of soccer’s slick, corporate, money-soaked future. Granado, though, was much happier. He considered himself something of an expert player, a scheming midfielder, and he was pleased with what he saw, threat to the fabric of the game or not. “It was,” he wrote, “one of the best games I have seen live, and there have been more than a few of those.”

Time, you will have noticed, is different now. It does not work quite as it used to. Why that might be is hard to discern. It could be the distorting effect of the pandemic, when every day is essentially the same, making last week feel distant but March seem somehow close.

Or it could be that living in such a rapid news cycle — the first wave and the protests and the second wave and the election and the President has tweeted what now? — has changed the meaning of immediacy, as though the brain is confused as to whether information needs to be filed in short- or long-term memory.

Either way, all of the familiar measurements of time seem somehow insufficient. A day, a week, a month no longer seem like something fixed, a period of tightly defined length. March lasted forever. April passed by in a flash. Remember when Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stepped down from the royal family? That was this year. Remember when Manchester United conceded six at home to Tottenham? That was 26 days ago.

Since then, of course, things have started to look up for United: a comfortable win at Newcastle, an impressive victory at Paris St.-Germain, a creditable draw at home against Chelsea that went on for several days and, on Wednesday, a 5-0 demolition at Old Trafford of RB Leipzig, Champions League semifinalists last season/two months ago.

United, suddenly, is surging. Ole Gunnar Solskjaer has proved his critics wrong. He has solved the midfield conundrum, tightened up the defense, found the right balance in attack. Paul Pogba is back. Harry Maguire is back. David De Gea is back. The troubles of the first few weeks of the season can be forgotten. That was early October! It was ages ago! It’s … late October now.

Sports have always worked a bit like this, of course, even if it seems quicker with every passing week. Reputations and expectations rise and fall roughly once every three days; each game seems to generate sweeping conclusions that can be safely discarded barely a week later.

But it is hard to escape the feeling that United, under Solskjaer, has been here before. His reign — nearly two years old now, though it feels like much less and also quite a lot more — has been characterized by streakiness.

Last week’s reminder that one team in every league has to be West Brom prompted Brian LaFatta to get in touch with what is, if we’re all honest, a much more salient point. “The excitement of premier fixtures like P.S.G. against Manchester United or Juventus-Real Madrid is, in large part, due to their rarity,” he wrote. “Funnel these teams into a super league and after a year or two, such matches will be no more exciting than a mid-September game between Liverpool and Spurs.”

This is absolutely right, but I do wonder if we — and by we I mean people of a certain generation — make the mistake of assuming everyone thinks like we do; perhaps, to a younger audience, those games would do just fine as standard, weekly fodder.

I’d also like to thank Shelly Fierston for her eloquent, and understandably angry, email about the deeply unappealing episode in which Sergio Agüero grabbed the neck of Sian Massey-Ellis, the Premier League’s handiest feminine assistant referee.

“As a girl, and the mummy of 19-year-old daughters, my outrage at Agüero’s ‘nonthreatening’ interplay with Massey-Ellis was once instant,” Shelly wrote. “Ask any lady you recognize who has labored in a qualified surroundings, and they’re going to acknowledge this conduct in an instant as one intended to decrease, demean, and intimidate.

“Skilled running girls around the globe, merely doing their jobs, are continuously required to navigate this repulsive conduct and are requested to forget about it, excuse, to snigger it off. Massey-Ellis is now left within the unenviable place of getting to both recognize the irritating come upon or ‘brush it off as unimportant’ — each eventualities offering a no-win scenario for her.

“Over and over, running girls are reduced whilst merely doing their jobs, and now not getting institutional make stronger to quash such conduct.”

Shelly is true to mention that Agüero will have to had been reprimanded via the Premier League. She is true to mention that Pep Guardiola’s statement that his striker is a “great man” isn’t in point of fact the purpose, as laid out brilliantly via The Father or mother’s Suzy Wrack here. And she is right to say that last week’s column should have highlighted and condemned the incident; it is a week too late, but I hope this goes some way to amending that last one.

That’s all for this week. Thanks, as ever, for all the ideas and tips and suggestions: keep them coming to I am available on Twitter if you want to talk about any 1950s Colombian esoterica, and Instagram if you want to see the frankly demanding footage of the “spooky stroll” I took my three-year-old son in this week. Set Piece Menu, then again, is amusing for all of the circle of relatives. Have an excellent weekend, and stay protected.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *